There are as well a whole host of practical
problems, which are peculiar to the newborn death situation.
Firstly
there are particular physical problems which may include the need to dry up the
breast milk and/or deal with engorgement.
The mother may also have a Caesar
scar or episiotomy scar that needs treatment.
Secondly, once home, there may be sexual problems
and the parents need to be counselled that it is normal and acceptable for one
or both of them to have no interest in sex.
'Sex' may be linked with “procreation” in their minds and some discussion around
sex-as-love, sex-as-comfort, sex-as-procreation and sex-as-recreation may be
necessary at some future stage.
The
flip side of parents who don’t want to have sex are the parents who immediately
try to have another baby. This is the so-called
‘replacement child’ syndrome.
Some
couples will verbalise the wish to immediately attempt a new pregnancy to
replace the dead child.
Whilst
this is perhaps, possibly,maybe therapeutic in
some isolated cases generally it only causes more problems as the dead baby has
not been adequately mourned, and the new baby comes with a bizarre set of
expectations.
The
point needs to be made to the parents that each child is special and unique and
that no child can be replaced by another, in the same way that a dead spouse
cannot be simply replaced.
People confuse “material” or “physical” replacement
with “emotional” replacement.
Thirdly there are the ‘layette’ problems.
These
are issues that arise from physical cues when the parents return home.
In the
first place they expected to return home as a family (or an enlarged family)
instead of as a couple. The visual cues that remind them of both their
childless state and the death may include a newly decorated nursery; a
compactum full of baby clothes; a baby seat in the car; even something as
mundane as hospital bills.
The
response to the cues varies considerably
with some parents wanting to throw out all of the clothes and toys,
whilst others choose to keep them.
There
is no “correct” behaviour, only functional and ‘dysfunctional’ behaviour.For
example the mother who a year after the death sits all day alone in the nursery
is probably in a dysfunctional state and needs professional help. By contrast
the mother who dusts the nursery once a week is exhibiting functional grief.
Fourthly there are a whole range of practical social
problems about which the parents should be counselled.
These include both family and work-related
expectations, all of which can have negative connotations for both the parents
and their family and friends.
For
example, the expectant grandparents feel cheated and sad. Sad that their
grandchild has died and sad that their own children are experiencing such grief
and pain.
Work
colleagues, all of whom know how to respond to a birth have no idea of how to
respond to the death;they may avoid the parents physically, or avoid talking
about the event and the parents experience a distancing from their family and
friends and feel isolated.
One
of the major problems is, ‘how long do the parents need to mourn ? And how long
does society give them permission to mourn ?
And how long do their friends expect them to mourn ?’
There
are two fundamental issues.
Firstly
, in a very real sense that the parents
will mourn for all of the rest of their life to a greater or lesser degree.
Secondly
is that in the acute setting, I believe that if it takes nine months for a
pregnancy to come to term, then it takes at least nine months for the acute
grief to be resolved.
Our
social cues such as films, books and television would seem to indicate that a
very short period of grief work is all that is required.
This
is manifestly not true.
I
believe that the parents often never stop mourning although the visible or
outward expression of the grief will change as their internal response change.
But
it is certainly not uncommon for the parents to be profoundly and visibly sad
for a year or longer, in the acute phase of their grief work.
But
“society” generally finds it difficult to deal with the death of a child, and
so the parents are encouraged to “cope” with their “problem", that is,
they are encouraged to hide their
feelings of anguish and to pretend that all is well.
So the parents and
grandparents walk around for years with hidden and silent feelings of sadness,
anger, depression and despair, feeling that they are unable to ventilate and
share their feelings.
There
are a number of organisations where it is permissible to discuss childhood
bereavement in a secure and supportive environment such as the Compassionate
Friends, an international self-help
group.
In
addition there are probably 'Mental health' services in most areas to which
parents (or staff) could be referred.
The only drawback to both self-help organisations and formal Mental Health practitioners
is that they wait for the parents to
come to them, for the parents to be pro-active, at a time when they have
difficulty just getting out of bed in the mo.
The
issue is really, do parents and staff have enough insight to realise that they
need to seek help ?
And
if they do have the insight, is there practical access to counselling in real time
?
Certainly within the EMS world, very few staff
ever recognise that they are “burnt-out” or stressed until there is a
precipitating event that sparks off some bizarre and disproportionate response.
And for a lot of EMS staff , psychology, psychiatry and social work are generally
all lumped together under a label of “witchcraft”!
One
of the exacerbating problems of EMS services in South Africa, is the relative lack of skills and services-, and the 'infra-structural isolation' of
communities. Additionally there is a lack of qualified staff in Casualty
Units, and the distances involved in transporting patients are frequently vast.
So whilst parents in Johannesburg may be told about the self-help groups; and
may have resources to get to them, chances are that parents living outside
of major urban areas will not be told about the services; and anyway lack the
personal-, and financial-,capacity and
resources needed to access specialist services.
Fifthly, there are the other children, the siblings
and cousins, waiting at home to consider.
The
other children at home will be waiting for ‘mommy’ to return home with their
baby brother. And then she doesn’t.
And
then no one talks about why there is no baby.
I
believe that children have a profound understanding of death.
Always.
And
as the child grows, so too does both their understanding of the event and their
ability to vocalise and verbalise their feelings and expressions of pain and
grief , loss and separation.
Beard
says that “factors such as age and
conceptual understanding, emotional and financial stability of the family;
support of relatives; individual personality; spiritual upbringing; and the
circumstances surrounding the death, all play a part in the child’s ability to
cope with it.”
Children
must not be excluded from death.
Any
questions that they ask should be answered at their level of comprehension, but
honestly, and without using euphemisms such as “your baby brother has gone to
sleep”;because euphemisms in children often set up other problems such as the child developing an irrational
fear of bedtime!
Parents
and health-workers should look for non-verbal cues hidden within the child’s
drawings or writings. And for verbal cues contained within ‘overheard’ language
such as what the child says in his prayers; what he says ‘offhand’ in the
shops, or in the sandpit.
Whatever
the child’s age, it needs to be impressed upon him that he was not responsible
in any way whatsoever for the death.
Children often have feelings of
omnipotence, and combined with negative feelings towards a potential rival for
their parents’ attention, may feel some degree of responsibility for the death.
The
easiest way for caring for the survivors is to include them in the funeral arrangements
and planning and even in the service itself if appropriate.
Fundamentally,
children should not be kept away from funerals.
Only
a generation or two ago, most children grew up in an extended family and saw-,
and were aware of-, all the seasons of life and learnt how to deal with
major-event emotions.
And of course they still do, if they live in a Second-,or third world environment.
The
involvement can take several forms ranging from letting them buy a ‘special’
toy for the dying child, to allowing them to choose a name for their sibling.
A
parent, writing about the death of her baby and the effect on her family says, “Melanie had brought one of her new toys, a pink fur mouse, to give to Andrew (in
his incubator).This toy is still very precious to us, and is useful for broaching conversations about Andrew”.
The
parents should be encouraged to share their feelings with their children and to
allow them to share their emotions with
the parents.
Again absolute honesty is required Children are not easily
deceived and cannot be totally sheltered from tragedy even if the parents try.
A
child whom is misled or told nothing may later wonder whether other important
matters are being discussed honestly, and feels alienated just as adults would.
Parents should present the facts simply and clearly, taking in mind the age of
the child.
Finally
the parents need to be reminded that every single person will have a different
response to the death, and will therefore have a different mourning
experience-different in intensity, duration and expression.
They
need to be told that it will probably take at least a year for the acute pain
to pass, but that it may take 2-3 years.
Gifford reiterates this point when she
writes that “probably the most basic truth about grief is that it lasts for
longer than most people think.(Further),grief is painful to witness, so, many
people, not knowing how to ease the sorrow, expect the bereaved to put their
grief aside,(easing everyone else’s’ discomfort) and get right back to normal.
Of course, such sidestepping is not only impossible,…it is also inappropriate.”
And
many people do not understand that the concept of “normal life” has been
altered irrevocably for most parents.
And
so they need to be told that they will never forget their child although the
expression and pattern of the grief will change.
Kenneth
Strong, a Nurse whose youngest son died says, “We have now experienced two
anniversaries, two birthdays and two Christmases without Tristam.
I have
disposed of all of Tristam's belongings, but in the bathroom his toothbrush
remains.
It is my last link with him,(and) I’ll probably never discard it.
I
was told that as the years passed I would forget the pain I experienced, but
I’m still waiting.”
No comments:
Post a Comment